U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Johnson v. Flannery

Johnson v. Flannery
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 13, 2003 · Michael, Per Curiam, Shedd, Wilkins
55 F. App'x 702

Johnson v. Flannery

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Wayne Johnson appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (2000) complaint, which the court properly construed as an action under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Johnson v. Flannery, No. CA-02-294-3 (E.D.Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.