UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7861

MARK ANTHONY GLENN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; RON ANGELONE; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-809-7)

Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 13, 2003

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark Anthony Glenn, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Mark Anthony Glenn appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

(2000) petition. An appeal may not

be taken from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless

a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability.

(c)(1) (2000). When, as here, a district court

dismisses a

petition solely on procedural grounds,

a certificate of appealability will not issue unless the petitioner

can demonstrate both “(1) ‘that jurists of reason would find it

debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial

of a constitutional right’ and (2) ‘that jurists of reason would

find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its

procedural ruling.’” Rose v. Lee,

(4th Cir.)

(quoting Slack v. McDaniel,

(2000)), cert.

denied,

(2001). We have reviewed the record and

conclude for the reasons stated by the district court that Glenn

has not made the requisite showing. See Glenn v. Virginia, No. CA-

02-809-7 (W.D. Va. Oct. 31, 2002). Accordingly, we deny a

certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See

(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2