Zahid v. Huffman
Opinion
Donna Marie Zahid appeals the district court’s order denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Zahid v. Huffman, No. CA-2-1035-7 (W.D.Va. Nov. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Donna Marie ZAHID, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patricia HUFFMAN; D. Parrish, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished