United States v. Saunders

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 12, 2003

Opinion

No. 02-7619

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CR-97-344)

Submitted: February 6, 2003 Decided: February 12, 2003

Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Troy R. Saunders, Appellant Pro Se. William Neil Hammerstrom, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Troy R. Saunders appeals the district court’s order denying

his motion to compel specific performance and granting the

Government’s motion to withdraw a previously filed motion for

sentence reduction under Fed. R. Crim. P. 35(b). We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Saunders,

No. CR-97-344 (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 7, 2002 & entered Oct. 8, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.