Terrence McCrady appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See McCrady v. Town of Wardensville, No. CA-02-23-3 (N.D.W.Va. Nov. 7, 2002). We deny McCrady’s motion for oral argument and his motion to strike Appellees’ informal brief. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.