Horace Gant appeals the district court's orders dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint as frivolous; and denying his Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Gant v. Dep’t of Corr., No. CA-02-627-5-H (E.D.N.C. filed Sept. 27, 2002 & entered Oct. 1, 2002; filed Nov. 4, 2002 & entered Nov. 5, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma *696 terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.