Binder v. United States
Opinion
Leila P. Binder appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motion to dismiss her civil employment action; denying her Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion; and denying her second motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Binder v. United States, No. CA-02-21 (E.D.Va. Sept. 27, 2002; Oct. 25, 2002; Nov. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Leila P. BINDER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America; United States Department of the Army; Brenda F. Mosley; Katherine A. Babb; Kathy L. Harrington; Miguela T. Gutierrez; Michael S. Oshiki, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished