Mohammad v. Angelone

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Mohammad v. Angelone, 55 F. App'x 669 (4th Cir. 2003)
Luttig, Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Williams

Mohammad v. Angelone

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Radey H. Mohammad appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mohammad v. Angelone, No. CA-01-819-3 (E.D.Va. May 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *670 the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Full Case Name
Radey H. MOHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Ronald ANGELONE; James Jenkins, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished