Mohammad v. Angelone
Mohammad v. Angelone
55 F. App'x 669
Mohammad v. Angelone
Opinion
Radey H. Mohammad appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for the defendants in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Mohammad v. Angelone, No. CA-01-819-3 (E.D.Va. May 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in *670 the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.