Martin v. Baskerville

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Martin v. Baskerville, 56 F. App'x 156 (4th Cir. 2003)
Hamilton, Per Curiam, Traxler, Wilkins

Martin v. Baskerville

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

William Murrell Martin, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). We have reviewed the record and conclude that Martin has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Reference

Full Case Name
William Murrell MARTIN, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant, v. Alton BASKERVILLE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
Status
Unpublished