U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Jordan v. NC Dept of Corr

Jordan v. NC Dept of Corr
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 28, 2003

Jordan v. NC Dept of Corr

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6083

LARRY JORDAN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION; EMILIO PAGAN, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-553-5-BO)

Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 28, 2003

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry Jordan, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Larry Jordan appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply with the court’s order directing Jordan to amend his complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. In the briefing order, Jordan was warned that this court would not consider issues not specifically raised in his informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Nonetheless, Jordan’s informal brief does not challenge the grounds for the district court’s dismissal of his complaint, but instead addresses the merits of his claims.

Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.