Harry James Fowler appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no re *184 versible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Fowler v. Bradley, No. CA-02-89-5-2MU (W.D.N.C. Sept. 25, 2002; filed Oct. 18, 2002, entered Oct. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.