Crudup v. Seay

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Crudup v. Seay

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7757

SYLVESTER CRUDUP,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

MARCIA SEAY, Grievance Coordinator/ Institutional Ombudsman; S. HUGHES, Grievance, Institutional Ombudsman; L. B. COLLINS, Inmate Hearing Officer; K. ORIE, Correctional Officer; W. BEST, Lieutenant, Correctional Officer; A. NETHERLAND, Captain, Correctional Officer; A. S. SCOTT, Captain, Correctional Officer; J. KEITT, Captain, Correctional Officer; L. BOOKER, Correctional Officer; S. MOORE, Sergeant, Correctional Officer; A. L. JOHNSON, Captain, Correctional Officer; W. PENN, Correctional Officer; SUSAN CARSON, Operations Officer; C. C. MURPHY, Assistant Warden of Operations; ALTON BASKERVILLE, Warden; W. P. ROGER, Regional Director; P. M. HENICK, Regional Ombudsman,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-755-2)

Submitted: February 20, 2003 Decided: February 26, 2003

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sylvester Crudup, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Sylvester Crudup appeals the district court’s order denying

relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1915A(b) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find that this

appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Crudup v. Seay, No. CA-02-

755-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 18, 2002). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished