Butler v. Gunja

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 26, 2003

Butler v. Gunja, 56 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James A. Butler appeals the district court’s order dismissing his Bivens * claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Butler v. Gunja, No. CA-01-3770-WMN (D. Md. June 12, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

Reference

Full Case Name: James A. BUTLER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. J.E. GUNJA, Health Services, Health Administrator; Forster, PA; Smith, PA; Kathleen H. Hawk; John Doe, Sued in His Individual and Official Capacity; Jane Doe, Sued in Her Individual and Official Capacity; Elayan; D. Miller; T. Miller; R. Cosgrove; Lieutenant Grey; D. Williams, Defendants-Appellees
Status: Unpublished