Hassan v. Bell

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Hassan v. Bell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2150

MUSTAFA S. HASSAN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID A. BELL; MICHAEL P. MURPHY; LAILA EDJLALA; TED WARD; KATHLEEN S. HALL; GEICO INSURANCE COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (CA-02-1136-A)

Submitted: February 12, 2003 Decided: February 25, 2003

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mustafa S. Hassan, Appellant Pro Se. Patrick Christopher Asplin, KEELER OBENSHAIN, P.C., Charlottesville, Virginia; Michael Joshi, MILLER, MILLER, KEARNEY & GESCHICKTER, Fairfax, Virginia; Brian Andrew Geschickter, GEICO, Fairfax, Virginia; Elaine Scott Moore, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Mustafa S. Hassan appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his complaint under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) for failure

to state a claim. Hassan claims the Defendants violated his various

constitutional and statutory rights based on their roles in a state

action that concluded adversely to him. We have reviewed the

record and find no reversible error. See Leonard v. Suthard,

927 F.2d 168, 169-70

(4th Cir. 1991). We therefore affirm the district

court’s order. See Hassan v. Bell, No. CA-02-1136-A (E.D. Va. filed

Sept. 27, 2002; entered Sept. 30, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished