U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Rome

United States v. Rome
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 14, 2003

United States v. Rome

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7904

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

CARLOS ROME, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CR-00-33-4)

Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 14, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Rome, Appellant Pro Se. C. J. Moore, Cherry Point, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Carlos Rome appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property, specifically $6245 in U.S. currency.

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Rome, No. CR-00-33-4 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.