United States v. James

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

United States v. James

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7685

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

ANDREA JOY JAMES, a/k/a Dee,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-98-128-5-BO, CA-02-236-5-BO)

Submitted: March 6, 2003 Decided: March 13, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Andrea Joy James, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, John Samuel Bowler, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Andrea Joy James seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on her motion filed under

28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that James

has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. ,

2003 WL 431659

, at *10 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662). Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See

28 U.S.C. § 2253

(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished