Sobin v. Brooks
Opinion
Dennis Sobin appeals the district court’s orders denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sobin v. Brooks, No. CA-01-54-AM (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 4, 2002, entered Sept. 5, 2002; filed Oct. 15, 2002, entered Oct. 16, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Dennis SOBIN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Joseph BROOKS, Warden, Respondent-Appellee, and Curtis Hise; Robert Alexander; Prison Staff Members, Known and Unknown, Respondents
- Status
- Unpublished