Washington v. Hampton Roads
Washington v. Hampton Roads
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 02-1713
JULIO R. WASHINGTON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
HAMPTON ROADS SHIPPING ASSOCIATION; ILA LOCAL 1248; ILA LOCAL 970; ILA SENIORITY BOARD; MANAGEMENT/ILA SENIORITY COMMITTEE; HAMPTON ROADS SHIPPING ASSOCIATION/ILA CONTRACT BOARD; HAMPTON ROADS DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL INDUSTRY GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE,
Defendants - Appellees,
LEE BOOTHBY,
Movant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CA-01-880-2)
Submitted: January 27, 2003 Decided: March 12, 2003
Before LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas R. Knoll, Sr., Staunton, Virginia; Lee Boothby, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Dean T. Buckius, Christopher Ambrosio, VANDEVENTER BLACK, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia; Deborah C. Waters, RUTTER, WALSH, MILLS, & RUTTER, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia; Charles S. Montagna, MONTAGNA, BREIT, KLEIN, CAMDEN, L.L.P., Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Julio Washington appeals the district court’s judgment
granting summary judgment to the defendants and dismissing his
employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. See Washington v. Hampton Roads,
CA-01-880-2 (E.D. Va. May 31, 2002). Having granted the motion to
submit the case on briefs, we dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal conclusions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished