U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Bruno v. Rushton

Bruno v. Rushton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 27, 2003

Bruno v. Rushton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7928

LAWRENCE MERLE BRUNO, Petitioner - Appellant, versus

COLIE L. RUSHTON; CHARLES M. CONDON, Attorney General of South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-772)

Submitted: March 14, 2003 Decided: March 27, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lawrence Merle Bruno, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Lawrence Merle Bruno seeks to appeal the district court’s order following the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Bruno has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 2003 WL 431659, at *10 (U.S. Feb. 25, 2003) (No. 01-7662). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.