U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. McFadden

United States v. McFadden
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 25, 2003 · Williams, Traxler, Hamilton
61 F. App'x 72

United States v. McFadden

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Edward M. McFadden appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to order the government to move for a Fed. R.Crim.P. 35(b) reduction in his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McFadden, No. CR-98-164 (D.S.C. filed Apr. 11, 2002, entered Apr. 15, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.