Wilfredo Gonzalez Lora appeals the district court’s orders (1) dismissing his claims under the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a (2000), for failure to state a claim, see 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2000), and (2) denying his motion filed under Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Lora v. INS, No. CA-02-756-2 (E.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2002; Nov. 1, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.