Gary L. DeTemple appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge to deny relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment under Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See DeTemple v. Paugh, No. CA-01-126-5 (N.D.W. Va. July 8, 2002; July 26, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.