U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

In re: McLamb v.

In re: McLamb v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 18, 2003 · Michael, King, Shedd
61 F. App'x 104

In re: McLamb v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Ernest Earl McLamb petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. After McLamb filed the instant mandamus petition, the district court ruled on his § 2255 motion. Accordingly, we deny McLamb’s mandamus petition as moot but grant his motion to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.