U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Aton v. Wackenhut Corp

Aton v. Wackenhut Corp
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 17, 2003

Aton v. Wackenhut Corp

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-1878

RASUN HERU ANPU ATON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

THE WACKENHUT CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 01-598-S)

Submitted: March 25, 2003 Decided: April 17, 2003

Before LUTTIG and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Steele, LAW OFFICE OF ERIC STEELE, Washington, D.C., for Appellant. Jeffrey P. Ayres, Thomas H. Strong, VENABLE, BAETJER & HOWARD, L.L.P., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Rasun Heru Anpu Aton appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Wackenhut in his employment discrimination suit. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Aton v. Wackenhut Corp., No. CA-01-598-S (D. Md. July 9, 2002; filed July 10, 2002, entered July 11, 2002).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.