U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Tokarski

United States v. Tokarski
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 24, 2003

United States v. Tokarski

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6277

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

MICHAEL S. TOKARSKI, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (CR-01-15, CA-02-63-4)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 24, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael S. Tokarski, Appellant Pro Se. Damon A. King, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael S. Tokarski seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Tokarski has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, U.S. , 123 S.Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.