Jones v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
Jones v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
Opinion
M. Rodney Jones seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed.
Parties are accorded thirty days after the entry of the district court’s final judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court extends the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). This appeal period is “mandatory and jurisdictional.” Browder v. Director, Dep’t of Corr., 434 U.S. 257, 264, 98 S.Ct. 556, 54 L.Ed.2d 521 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229, 80 S.Ct. 282, 4 L.Ed.2d 259 (1960)).
The district court’s order was entered on the docket on August 21, 2002. The notice of appeal was filed no earlier than October 31, 2002. * Because Jones failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. We also deny Jones’ motions for appointment of counsel and for protection from inmates and staff at the South Carolina Department of Corrections. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Jones’ notice of appeal was received by the district court on November 5, 2002. However, we must consider it filed as of the date it was delivered to prison officials for mailing. See Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 108 S.Ct. 2379, 101 L.Ed.2d 245 (1988). Giving Jones every benefit of the doubt, his notice is deemed filed on October 31, 2002.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.