U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Byrd v. NC State

Byrd v. NC State
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 29, 2003

Byrd v. NC State

Opinion

Filed: April 29, 2003 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1217 (CA-02-112-5-BO)

Victor Byrd, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

North Carolina State University, etc., Defendant - Appellee.

O R D E R

The court amends its opinion filed April 22, 2003, as follows: On the cover sheet, section 7, line 1 -- counsel’s name is corrected to read “Celia Grasty Lata.”

For the Court - By Direction

/s/ Patricia S. Connor Clerk UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1217

VICTOR BYRD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY, University Temporary Services, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-112-5-BO)

Submitted: April 17, 2003 Decided: April 22, 2003

Before WIDENER, WILLIAMS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Byrd, Appellant Pro Se. Celia Grasty Lata, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Victor Byrd appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging employment discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Byrd v. North Carolina State Univ., No. CA- 02-112-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Feb. 5, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.