U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Swift

United States v. Swift
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 15, 2003

United States v. Swift

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6925

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

JAMES CORNELL SWIFT, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Raymond A. Jackson, District Judge. (CR-99-13)

Submitted: April 24, 2003 Decided: May 15, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Cornell Swift, Appellant Pro Se. James Ashford Metcalfe, Assistant United States Attorney, William David Muhr, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: James Cornell Swift appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for modification of his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Swift, No. CR-99-13 (E.D.

Va. May 10, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.