U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Spencer v. Easter

Spencer v. Easter
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 20, 2003 · Luttig, King, Hamilton
63 F. App'x 160

Spencer v. Easter

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Micheál Lee Spencer, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spencer v. Easter, No. CA-01-1579-AM (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 24, 2002 & entered Oct. 25, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.