U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Pigford v. United States

Pigford v. United States
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 20, 2003 · Luttig, King, Hamilton
63 F. App'x 150

Pigford v. United States

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Appellants appeal the district court’s order denying their Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Pigford v. United States, No. CA-01-200-7-F (E.D.N.C. July 24, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.