UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2341

BERNARD DUNCAN, Reverend, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Mecklenburg Correctional Center, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 02-2454

BERNARD DUNCAN, Reverend, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Mecklenburg Correctional Center, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, District Judge. (CA-02-616-3) Submitted: April 18, 2003 Decided: May 19, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bernard Duncan, Appellant Pro Se. Margaret Alice Browne, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Bernard Duncan appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his discrimination action and denying his motion for judicial recusal. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Duncan v. Virginia, No. CA-02-616-3 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4 & Dec. 12, 2002).

Duncan also seeks to appeal this Court’s May 25, 2001, opinion affirming the district court’s dismissal of his previous discrimination action. Duncan v. Commonwealth of Virginia, No. 00- 2551, 9 Fed. Appx. 236, 2001 WL 565672 (4th Cir. May 25, 2001) (unpublished). We have previously denied both Duncan’s rehearing petition as to this decision and his motion for reconsideration of the denial of his rehearing petition. No further “appeal” to this Court is available.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED