U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. McDaniel

United States v. McDaniel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 30, 2003 · Michael, Motz, Gregory
65 F. App'x 473

United States v. McDaniel

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth Eugene McDaniel appeals from the district court’s order denying his “Motion for an Order to Compel/Specific Performance of a Plea Agreement.” We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. McDaniel, Nos. CR-9-111; CA-00-90-3 (W.D.N.C. Mar. 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.