U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Badmus

United States v. Badmus
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 2003 · Wilkinson, Motz, Traxler
63 F. App'x 766

United States v. Badmus

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM:

Jimoh A. Badmus appeals the district court’s order denying his petition for a writ of audita querela. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Badmus, No. CR-91-453-1 (E.D.Va. Oct. 21, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.