U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Skinner v. Mobashar

Skinner v. Mobashar
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 29, 2003

Skinner v. Mobashar

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6181

AUSTIN SKINNER, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

NASEER MOBASHAR, Physician; B. C. ELLIOTT, Psychiatrist; M. ALTIZER, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-915-7)

Submitted: April 18, 2003 Decided: May 29, 2003

Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Austin Skinner, Appellant Pro Se. Jim Harold Guynn, Jr., GUYNN & MEMMER, P.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Austin Skinner appeals the district court’s order dismissing with prejudice his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000), and dismissing without prejudice any and all state law claims implicated by the pleadings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Skinner v. Mobashar, No. CA-01-915-7 (W.D. Va. Dec. 17, 2002). Skinner’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.