Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Vernon S. Spriggs appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendant and denying Spriggs’ motions to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Spriggs v. Sondervan, No. CA-02-1331CCB (D.Md. Dec. 4, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.