U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Edmonds v. Moore

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 27, 2003 · Luttig, King, Hamilton

63 F. App'x 750

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

PER CURIAM.

Andre Edmonds appeals the district court’s order dismissing all claims against Elizabeth H. Paret, Clerk for the United States District Court, Eastern District of Virginia. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Edmonds v. Moore, No. CA-02-805 (E.D.Va. Jan. 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Edmonds’ claim, raised for the first time on appeal, that Paret perpetrated a fraud on the district court in her defense of this matter is not properly before this court for consideration. Muth v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.