Augustine Perez appeals the district court’s order dismissing his pleadings which attempted to challenge his convictions through a petition for writ of audita querela and under former Fed. R.Crim. P 35(a). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. - Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Perez, No. CR-90-112-L (W.D.Va. May 16, 2001; Dec. 23, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.