U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Correa v. Roadway Express

Correa v. Roadway Express
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 3, 2003

Correa v. Roadway Express

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-1163

JUVENTINO CORREA, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ROADWAY EXPRESS, Defendant - Appellee, and

HEALTH SOUTH, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. James A. Beaty, Jr., District Judge. (CA-00-587-1)

Submitted: May 29, 2003 Decided: June 3, 2003

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Juventino Correa, Appellant Pro Se. Alan Bruce Clarke, Charles Matthew Keen, Sheri Lea Roberson, OGLETREE, DEAKINS, NASH, SMOAK & STEWART, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Juventino Correa appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of Roadway Express in Correa’s employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Correa v. Roadway Express, No. CA-00-587-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 2, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.