Camille Ford appeals the district court’s order denying her motion to reopen her previous § 2255 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Ford, Nos. CR-94-163; CA-98-1206 (E.D.Va. Sept. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.