United States v. Smart
United States v. Smart
67 F. App'x 225
United States v. Smart
Opinion
Herbert Smart appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to unseal three psychiatric reports. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smart, No. CR-97-25 (E.D.Va. Apr. 22, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.