U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Cabbage

United States v. Cabbage
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 19, 2003 · Luttig, Traxler, Hamilton
67 F. App'x 213

United States v. Cabbage

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Phillip Henry Cabbage seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken to this court from the final order in a habeas corpus proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Cabbage has not satisfied this standard. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny Cabbage’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We grant his motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.