David J. Williams appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find nó reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Williams v. North Carolina, No. CA-03-182-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.