Revels v. Ervin
Revels v. Ervin
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 03-6509
JOSEPH SAMUEL REVELS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus
J. D. ERVIN, Chief and others; POCOMOKE CITY FIRE AND RESCUE DEPARTMENT; MICHAEL THORNTON, Chief, Pocomoke City Fire and Rescue Department; AMBULANCE PERSONNEL AND OTHERS; SERGEANT TOWNSEND; RALPH CORBIN, Officer; DAMON PROPST, Officer; WORCESTER COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, Warden and others, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, Senior District Judge. (CA-02-3320-01-WMN)
Submitted: June 12, 2003 Decided: June 18, 2003
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joseph Samuel Revels, Appellant Pro Se. Kevin Bock Karpinski, ALLEN, KARPINSKI, BRYANT & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM: Joseph Samuel Revels appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Revels’ motion for the production of tape recordings, interviews, and medical records, and we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Revels v. Ervin, No. CA-02-3320-01-WMN (D.
Md. Feb. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.