U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Moorer

United States v. Moorer
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 26, 2003

United States v. Moorer

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6752

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

ETROY CARLOS MOORER, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. C. Weston Houck, District Judge. (CR-97-43, CA-00-1002-2-12)

Submitted: June 19, 2003 Decided: June 26, 2003

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Etroy Carlos Moorer, Appellant Pro Se. Sean Kittrell, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charleston, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Etroy Carlos Moorer seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Moorer has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 123 S. Ct. 1029 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.