U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

In Re: Spotts v.

In Re: Spotts v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided June 25, 2003 · Niemeyer, Michael, Hamilton
67 F. App'x 822

In Re: Spotts v.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Kelvin Andre Spotts petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his motion to compel partial summary judgment and to grant partial summary judgment on his underlying 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny the petition for a writ of mandamus. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.