U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

In Re: McEvily v.

In Re: McEvily v.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 11, 2003

In Re: McEvily v.

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6518

In Re: MICHAEL MCEVILY, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-01-297-7)

Submitted: June 23, 2003 Decided: July 11, 2003

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael McEvily, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Michael McEvily petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Although we find that mandamus relief is not warranted because the delay is not unreasonable, we deny the mandamus petition without prejudice to the filing of another mandamus petition if the district court does not act expeditiously.

We grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.