U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

United States v. Pabellon

United States v. Pabellon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 23, 2003

United States v. Pabellon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6783

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus

SONJI PRINCE PABELLON, a/k/a Sonji Prince, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-98-1169)

Submitted: July 15, 2003 Decided: July 23, 2003

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sonji Prince Pabellon, Appellant Pro Se. Harold Watson Gowdy, III, Elizabeth Jean Howard, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Sonji Prince Pabellon appeals the district court’s denial of her motion for modification of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Pabellon, No. 98-CR-1169 (D.S.C. Mar. 27, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.