U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Paige v. Kupec

Paige v. Kupec
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 31, 2003

Paige v. Kupec

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6722

ANTHONY TYRONE PAIGE, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus

ROBERT J. KUPEC, Warden and Others; JUDITH WINNINGHAM, Physician’s Assistant, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-3430-8-AW)

Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 31, 2003

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Tyrone Paige, Appellant Pro Se. Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore Maryland; Donald Joseph Crawford, ALDELMAN, SHEFF & SMITH, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Anthony Tyrone Paige appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Paige v. Kupec, No. CA-02-3430-8-AW (D. Md. Apr. 1, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.