U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2003

Calderon v. Sondervon

Calderon v. Sondervon
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 30, 2003

Calderon v. Sondervon

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6285

CARLOS CALDERON, Plaintiff - Appellant, and

ROBERT VIZZINI, Plaintiff, versus

WILLIAM W. SONDERVAN, Commissioner; PATRICK CONROY, Warden; JAMES V. PEGUESE, Warden; BURLIE FRINK, Security Chief; MICHAEL SYKES, Defendants - Appellees, and

STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-2183-AW)

Submitted: July 24, 2003 Decided: July 30, 2003

Before MICAHEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carlos Calderon, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Sharon Stanley Street, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM: Carlos Calderon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Calderon v. Sondervan, No. CA-02-2183-AW (D. Md. Jan. 13, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.